The Meaning
of Words Versus the Meaning of a Book
By: Sophie Mark
By: Sophie Mark
Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn is over 110,000 words
long. Of those words, 219 of them are the word “nigger”. This is less than even
half a percent of the total number of words in the book, yet this one word that
occurs 219 times is the word most associated with the novel, the word that has
led to many schools to make the decision to not teach this book, and the cause
of one of the biggest censorship debates in modern America. The controversy
around the n-word in Huck Finn has blown this single word enormously out of proportion,
and in the process, often blotted out the larger question of the book’s
inherent value as a whole. No word, no matter how offensive, should determine
whether an entire book should be taught or not. The question of whether Huck
Finn should be taught should be based on the overall themes and quality of the
book, not exclusively Mark Twain’s word choice. Only if the book is worth teaching
as a whole can the debate over the use of the word be resolved, or even be
worth resolving.
Certainly,
it is true that from the standpoint of social reform, readers of Huck Finn are usually discouraged at
Huck’s lack of material progress. He may develop mentally and morally to be
more critical of his society, but at no point does he take the step of actually
denouncing racism as a whole, or devoting himself to doing whatever he can to
change the society in which he lives. Many have pointed out that Huck’s running
off to the “territories” to escape civilization is the easy way out, sparing
him from staying in the society and trying to change it. Yet I would point out
that the book is equally focused on the negative qualities of southern society
as a whole as the positive qualities in Huck. It is the absence of these
qualities - racism, taking advantage of others, self-interest, dishonesty - in
Huck’s character by the end of the story that makes him important. This is made
more remarkable by the fact that Huck has reached this state of development as
a twelve-year-old, when for the entire story he has been witnessing an abusive
father, swindlers, families so sunk in their own pride that they sacrifice their
young sons to honor a pointless feud, even kind people who consider slavery and
racism a natural part of life, and entire towns of gullibly sheep-like people
set in their own ways as the normal components of society. Especially if we
look at Tom Sawyer’s childish use of Jim and also Huck for his own amusement,
it becomes clear that for his age, Huck is remarkable by contrast. If a child
overcoming such prejudices all around him and ingrained within him from birth
by the age of twelve, to such a degree that he is willing to say “"All right, then, I'll GO to hell"” (134) to
protect Jim from slavery, does not show the power of an individual to overcome
the pressure of society, then what is? This is the key to why Huck Finn has value: the fact that Huck
refuses to accept a society that every influence in his life outside himself is
pushing him to embrace.
Thus,
the answer to the censorship question lies in the larger question of the value
of the novel itself. Many critics only remember from reading Huck Finn in high school “the teacher’s tortured explanation that Twain’s
“nigger” didn’t really mean nigger, or meant it ironically, or historically, or
symbolically” (Butler). I disagree. Mark Twain meant for the use of this word
to recall every bit of offensive meaning attached to it in the minds of his
readers, in order to reinforce the magnitude of society’s prejudice. If
teachers believe that the lesson of the power of the individual to combat an
entire society makes the book worth reading, then to teach this book any other
way than the way Mark Twain wrote it not only lessens Huck’s achievement by
minimizing the most inhuman part of society’s prejudice, but also undermines
the importance of the book. How much can a student truly get out of a book or
want to read it at all if they are impressed with the fact that the author’s
message was not important enough to merit the book being read the way the
author wrote it?
Works Cited
Butler,
Paul. “Why Read That Book?” Nytimes.com.
The New York Times Company. 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 10 Jan. 2014.
Twain,
Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
New York: Charles L. Webster and Co., 1884. Project
Gutenberg. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
Can I just start out by saying that your introduction had me hooked?! From the very beginning I was dying to know more about your point..that I totally agree with by the way! The book can spark so many intriguing discussions and can be taught in a way that highlights the other 109781 words in the novel. The book honestly has so much to offer that the word choice should not be a debating factor--the content should decide that for a classroom. You bring really good points to the table and the way you present them is magnificent!! :)
ReplyDeleteI agree with Aurora 100%! Your intro is amazing! Words should not decide whether or not the book is read and the book should be read how Mark Twain wrote it. Also, I love how you end your op-ed with a question. It makes me keep wondering about the issue. Good job Sophie :)
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you are saying, that Huckleberry Finn should be read in schools, because the n-word is how we know that Huck has changed. If the words became less harsh, then Huck's change wouldn't have been so palpable because the word expresses how big the problem of racism is. We would have never really thought that Huck had changed such a large amount if the n-word would have been replaced with a less harsh word.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you when you said "the controversy around the n-word in Huck Finn has blown this single word enormously out of proportion," because it has. Critics believe that Twain used it for just racial context but they need to understand that racism was part of history and we need to learn about. That way we, as high school students, can truly understand the meaning of this book. You did great explaining yourself and our intro was great Sophie!
ReplyDelete